Main Menu
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
[WiwiHome :: Meetings, Agendas, Minutes and Budgets :: 10th November 2006 :: Workshop:2 :: This page]  

Communication Guidelines

Introduction

Following our Critical Practice as an open organisation workshop it seems it would be a good idea to form some guidelines for communication to allow for a more accessible and effective dialogue in and around Critical Practice.

Communication Guidelines

PAGE TITLES

Wiki page names should be clear and informative:

Name Wiki pages according to an agreed format (posted on relevant wiki pages or all on the page) to make grouping and archiving of pages easier - eg:

  • Agenda - 10th October 2006
  • Meeting - 10th October 2006
  • keep page titles short and descriptive: this makes linking (see above) and remembering them easier

    LINKS

  • The genius of wikis is the ease of making links - like this [[]].
  • So link!
  • In any text or page produced, link forward and/or backward to any other page or text [the new page or text] refers to. Try to remember the reader, how are they to follow your thoughts and observations.........
  • CLARITY

  • - Aim for clarity in all posts
  • mailing list/proposals/comments/forum posts - making a post clear and concise saves a lot of time for the people reading it.

  • For longer documents (in particular minutes/proposals) include a summary and/or outcomes at the head of the document.
  • Mailing list 'subject headers'

  • should be clear and informative. Replies to subjects should retain the same subject header and new topics should be posted with new subject headers. This makes the mailing list archive easier to understand and follow.

  • Back to Housekeeping/Workshop:2
    Last modified: 14.11.06 by Tom  

    Comments

    Poster Thread
    Tom
    Posted: 2006/11/14 13:00  Updated: 2006/11/14 13:00
    Joined: 2006/6/1
    From:
    Posts: 10
     Re: Communication Guidelines
    RE: LINKS - It does automatically show the thread of how the page is linked in the page title bar but only seems to show one 'route'.

    Poster Thread
    Tom
    Posted: 2006/11/14 13:07  Updated: 2006/11/14 13:07
    Joined: 2006/6/1
    From:
    Posts: 10
     Re: Communication Guidelines
    It seems like it would be useful to have a 'back to' link (I've put one in at the top) to explicitly link to where the page comes from. And then in the article main body most links could be linking forward so to speak. Not sure about this. Any thoughts?

    Poster Thread
    neil
    Posted: 2006/11/14 14:18  Updated: 2006/11/14 14:18
    Joined: 2006/5/29
    From:
    Posts: 36
     Re: Communication Guidelines
    I think at the bottom (footer) is better, after digesting the content you should be able to navigate forwrd or back.

    As for links, I meant in the body of the text, like from Agenda to relevant Minutes and back again, or from Agenda to Project, etc.

    Short page titles would make life easier too!
    This is aimed at you Mary Anne

    best

    nil

    Poster Thread
    Tom
    Posted: 2006/11/14 14:37  Updated: 2006/11/14 14:37
    Joined: 2006/6/1
    From:
    Posts: 10
     Re: Communication Guidelines
    Would it be best to right justify the 'back to' link and do you know how?
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
    Search
    Who's Online
    3 user(s) are online (1 user(s) are browsing Wiki)

    Members: 0
    Guests: 3

    more...
    New Members
    Claudia 2008/10/2
    hayley 2008/4/11
    simonL 2008/2/7
    r_fortnum 2008/1/30
    clare 2007/10/27
    Joseph 2007/10/23
    kelly 2007/10/15
    jj2 2007/10/12
    ljc 2007/10/6
    Robdingle 2007/10/3