Search results

Jump to: navigation, search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • '''A-TTEN-DANCE:''' Karem, Neil, Marsha, Denise, Angela and Claire. <br> ...This will be a tool for people to invite friends and family, etc. Further, Claire will talk to Wendy about publicity--perhaps the Guardian can do a feature (
    10 KB (1,593 words) - 17:11, 12 May 2015
  • Medievalist [[Claire Mokrauer-Madden]]
    913 B (113 words) - 12:47, 22 May 2019
  • Or, we could situate Critical Practice in what curators and critics like Claire Bishop and Maria Lind have called “the collaborative turn.” We could sa
    20 KB (3,280 words) - 12:07, 7 December 2010
  • ...rgues Berrebi in the first part of this text. Her discussion is similar to Claire Bishop’s critique of contemporary collaborative culture (also in Art Righ
    8 KB (1,134 words) - 16:37, 13 March 2008
  • ...rgues Berrebi in the first part of this text. Her discussion is similar to Claire Bishop’s critique of contemporary collaborative culture (also in ''Art Ri
    10 KB (1,440 words) - 02:36, 24 November 2010
  • ...he collaborative turn.” Animating this description is her discussion of Claire Bishop and Stephen Wright’s critiques of Nicolas Bourriaud’s relational
    10 KB (1,472 words) - 02:36, 24 November 2010
  • ...my literature review reveals, curatorial or art historical surveys abound (Claire Bishop, Maria Lind and Charles Green et al), but there is little discussion
    6 KB (963 words) - 11:13, 28 March 2009
  • ...of Listening in the Time of Talking,” when, as part of his discussion on Claire Bishop’s advocacy of agonistic pluralism , he observes that “If Mouffe ...s model was developed for social work and not for art practice, and that Claire Bishop and others have critiqued some discursive practices on the grounds
    6 KB (817 words) - 19:09, 25 August 2010
  • '''Bishop, Claire. “The Social Turn: Collaboration and Its Discontents.” In ''Right About Claire Bishop’s short paper begins with a curious quote from Dan Graham: “All
    4 KB (609 words) - 07:11, 30 May 2011
  • Claire Bishop, Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics [[Claire Bishop, Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics Section One|Section One: The P
    1 KB (132 words) - 23:41, 22 October 2009
  • 2. Claire Bishop
    1 KB (170 words) - 17:20, 24 April 2008
  • ...A. What, for example, are the "aesthetic" criteria of this project, to use Claire Bishop's term? MR and CC responded that they both felt there was a strong D
    5 KB (870 words) - 23:33, 23 February 2009
  • ...A. What, for example, are the "aesthetic" criteria of this project, to use Claire Bishop's term? MR and CC responded that they both felt there was a strong D
    5 KB (867 words) - 00:01, 24 February 2009
  • Or, we could situate Critical Practice in what curators and critics like Claire Bishop and Maria Lind have called "the social turn' and “the collaborativ
    20 KB (3,280 words) - 11:58, 19 July 2008
  • Claire Bishop has done some useful work in this direction in her article [[Claire Bishop: The Social Turn: Collaboration and its Discontents |"The Social Tur
    5 KB (744 words) - 13:48, 7 March 2009
  • ...lity meant in this context. My interest in this definition relates back to Claire Bishop’s concerns that the formal quality of collaborative art tends to b
    9 KB (1,479 words) - 13:39, 28 April 2009
  • return to [[Claire Bishop: Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics]]<br>
    2 KB (253 words) - 08:46, 23 October 2009
  • return to [[Claire Bishop: Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics]]<br>
    2 KB (354 words) - 09:11, 23 October 2009
  • ...text identified by Michael Biggs|Michael Biggs: Questions of Context]] * [[Claire Bishop: Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics]] [[Claire Bishop: The Social Turn: Collaboration and its Discontents]] * [[Henk Borgd
    5 KB (750 words) - 11:15, 6 July 2013
  • ...tical vagaries and historical revisions have been observed in critiques by Claire Bishop, Anthony Downey and others. There's a general consensus this approac
    6 KB (954 words) - 21:38, 11 November 2010

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)