Difference between revisions of "Odd Thoughts on Collaboration"

From Critical Practice Chelsea
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
----
 
----
 
Return to [[Threads and Quotes]] * [[Annotations]] *  [[Practice Literature]] * [[Main Page]]
 
Return to [[Threads and Quotes]] * [[Annotations]] *  [[Practice Literature]] * [[Main Page]]
 +
http://criticalpracticechelsea.org/wiki/skins/common/images/button_bold.png
 +
 +
'''Wolmark, Jenny and Eleanor Gates-Stuart. "Research as Cultural Practice." ''Working Papers in Art and Design'' 2, 2002.'''
 +
The issue of 'ownership,' too, became less easy either to quantify or resolve when working with a flexible concept of collaboration. From the point of view of the issues explored in this paper, the most significance aspect of the process was that the knowledge framework--that is, the expectations, roles and tacit 'rules' that are usual in such situations - was undermined from the start. This produced an unstable situation that had to be negotiated by all those involved, because no single perspective appeared to dominate as different cultural practices intersected.(p. 3)''
 +
 +
 +
Questions raised by John Robert's paper: <br>
 +
Is collaboration essentially a post-autonomous condition? Is it a means by which art is able to dissolve its use value into everyday practice? Or is it a space for autonomy - and if so, what does this autonomy entail?
  
  
Line 17: Line 25:
  
  
<blockquote>''The issue of 'ownership,' too, became less easy either to quantify or resolve when working with a flexible concept of collaboration. From the point of view of the issues explored in this paper, the most significance aspect of the process was that the knowledge framework--that is, the expectations, roles and tacit 'rules' that are usual in such situations - was undermined from the start. This produced an unstable situation that had to be negotiated by all those involved, because no single perspective appeared to dominate as different cultural practices intersected.(JW and EGS: RCP, 3)''</blockquote>
 
 
 
Questions raised by John Robert's paper: <br>
 
Is collaboration essentially a post-autonomous condition? Is it a means by which art is able to dissolve its use value into everyday practice? Or is it a space for autonomy - and if so, what does this autonomy entail?
 
  
 
----
 
----
 
Return to [[Threads and Quotes]]
 
Return to [[Threads and Quotes]]

Revision as of 17:43, 21 August 2010


Return to Threads and Quotes * Annotations * Practice Literature * Main Page button_bold.png

Wolmark, Jenny and Eleanor Gates-Stuart. "Research as Cultural Practice." Working Papers in Art and Design 2, 2002. The issue of 'ownership,' too, became less easy either to quantify or resolve when working with a flexible concept of collaboration. From the point of view of the issues explored in this paper, the most significance aspect of the process was that the knowledge framework--that is, the expectations, roles and tacit 'rules' that are usual in such situations - was undermined from the start. This produced an unstable situation that had to be negotiated by all those involved, because no single perspective appeared to dominate as different cultural practices intersected.(p. 3)


Questions raised by John Robert's paper:
Is collaboration essentially a post-autonomous condition? Is it a means by which art is able to dissolve its use value into everyday practice? Or is it a space for autonomy - and if so, what does this autonomy entail?


Return to Threads and Quotes * Annotations * Practice Literature * Main Page

comments:





Return to Threads and Quotes