Difference between revisions of "Roaming Discussion: 1916"

From Critical Practice Chelsea
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
+
=[http://enececufo.co.cc This Page Is Currently Under Construction And Will Be Available Shortly, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page]=
<tr>
+
&lt;table cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
<td valign="top" style="padding-right: 20px;">
+
&lt;tr&gt;
 +
&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot; style=&quot;padding-right: 20px;&quot;&gt;
  
'''Roaming Discussion of 1916 with Neil Cummings'''<br>
+
'''Roaming Discussion of 1916 with Neil Cummings'''&lt;br&gt;
March 18, 2010 - Triangle Space, Chelsea College of Art and Design<br>
+
March 18, 2010 - Triangle Space, Chelsea College of Art and Design&lt;br&gt;
 
'''In attendance:''' Neil Cummings, Kristen Lovelock, Scott Schwager, Maria Christoforatou and Me
 
'''In attendance:''' Neil Cummings, Kristen Lovelock, Scott Schwager, Maria Christoforatou and Me
  
*This "informal critique" was not structured like the classic "the artist doesn't talk" variety. (As, for instance, in [[Show Not Tell Seminar Series]].)
+
*This &quot;informal critique&quot; was not structured like the classic &quot;the artist doesn't talk&quot; variety. (As, for instance, in [[Show Not Tell Seminar Series]].)
*Recurrent theme - what it means to focus on one's "subject" (the subject of an artwork) - for example, Kristen's concern with co-habitation - should she or shouldn't she move in with her boyfriend? That's the focus. The references to surrealism and holidays confused this focus - They may well have be a focus in their own right (which was my initial reading of the work) - they just weren't the artist's main focus in this piece; nor were they working in the service of her focus...
+
*Recurrent theme - what it means to focus on one's &quot;subject&quot; (the subject of an artwork) - for example, Kristen's concern with co-habitation - should she or shouldn't she move in with her boyfriend? That's the focus. The references to surrealism and holidays confused this focus - They may well have be a focus in their own right (which was my initial reading of the work) - they just weren't the artist's main focus in this piece; nor were they working in the service of her focus...
 
*Lots of discussion around the frame of the gallery and the power of this frame - there's a tendency to:  
 
*Lots of discussion around the frame of the gallery and the power of this frame - there's a tendency to:  
 
#Make stuff that looks like art - for example, how the bathroom paintings were hung - they went from being on a shelf (in a real bathroom) to being in a gallery  
 
#Make stuff that looks like art - for example, how the bathroom paintings were hung - they went from being on a shelf (in a real bathroom) to being in a gallery  
#To indulge in "creative" installation - the artist forgets to become installer - or the installer plays at being an artist - the result: the hang is aestheticized in non-essential ways.  
+
#To indulge in &quot;creative&quot; installation - the artist forgets to become installer - or the installer plays at being an artist - the result: the hang is aestheticized in non-essential ways.  
 
#To insufficiently consider the power of the gallery - Maria's painting should have been bigger or smaller - as it was, its domestic scale wasn't working in the weird space that is the Triangle Gallery.  
 
#To insufficiently consider the power of the gallery - Maria's painting should have been bigger or smaller - as it was, its domestic scale wasn't working in the weird space that is the Triangle Gallery.  
 
*Scott's seesaw is provocative - fun and absurd...The artist is interested in the balance of power and engaging with the seesaw enacts this idea. But as Neil observed, this one was weighted in the middle - the balance issue wasn't literalized in the artwork. And yet, I know that I, for one, felt self-conscious about my own body when riding the seesaw - I looked for people who where about my size to ride with...
 
*Scott's seesaw is provocative - fun and absurd...The artist is interested in the balance of power and engaging with the seesaw enacts this idea. But as Neil observed, this one was weighted in the middle - the balance issue wasn't literalized in the artwork. And yet, I know that I, for one, felt self-conscious about my own body when riding the seesaw - I looked for people who where about my size to ride with...
Line 17: Line 18:
  
 
----
 
----
Return to [[Walks]]<br>
+
Return to [[Walks]]&lt;br&gt;
Return to [[User:Marsha| Marsha Bradfield's Research Hub]]<br>
+
Return to [[User:Marsha| Marsha Bradfield's Research Hub]]&lt;br&gt;
Visit [[Marsha Bradfield|Marsha's bio page]] <br>
+
Visit [[Marsha Bradfield|Marsha's bio page]] &lt;br&gt;
  
Return to [[artists, researchers, academics and others]]<br>
+
Return to [[artists, researchers, academics and others]]&lt;br&gt;
Return to [[Main Page]] <br>
+
Return to [[Main Page]] &lt;br&gt;
  
</td>
+
&lt;/td&gt;
<td width="250px" valign="top" style="padding-left: 20px; border-left: 1px dotted #69c;">
+
&lt;td width=&quot;250px&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; style=&quot;padding-left: 20px; border-left: 1px dotted #69c;&quot;&gt;
  
 
[[Image:Kristen Lovelock Should I Move in with Him.jpg]]
 
[[Image:Kristen Lovelock Should I Move in with Him.jpg]]
 
Kristen Lovelock - part of ''Should I move in with him''
 
Kristen Lovelock - part of ''Should I move in with him''

Revision as of 11:21, 24 November 2010

This Page Is Currently Under Construction And Will Be Available Shortly, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page

<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr> <td valign="top" style="padding-right: 20px;">

Roaming Discussion of 1916 with Neil Cummings<br> March 18, 2010 - Triangle Space, Chelsea College of Art and Design<br> In attendance: Neil Cummings, Kristen Lovelock, Scott Schwager, Maria Christoforatou and Me

  • This "informal critique" was not structured like the classic "the artist doesn't talk" variety. (As, for instance, in Show Not Tell Seminar Series.)
  • Recurrent theme - what it means to focus on one's "subject" (the subject of an artwork) - for example, Kristen's concern with co-habitation - should she or shouldn't she move in with her boyfriend? That's the focus. The references to surrealism and holidays confused this focus - They may well have be a focus in their own right (which was my initial reading of the work) - they just weren't the artist's main focus in this piece; nor were they working in the service of her focus...
  • Lots of discussion around the frame of the gallery and the power of this frame - there's a tendency to:
  1. Make stuff that looks like art - for example, how the bathroom paintings were hung - they went from being on a shelf (in a real bathroom) to being in a gallery
  2. To indulge in "creative" installation - the artist forgets to become installer - or the installer plays at being an artist - the result: the hang is aestheticized in non-essential ways.
  3. To insufficiently consider the power of the gallery - Maria's painting should have been bigger or smaller - as it was, its domestic scale wasn't working in the weird space that is the Triangle Gallery.
  • Scott's seesaw is provocative - fun and absurd...The artist is interested in the balance of power and engaging with the seesaw enacts this idea. But as Neil observed, this one was weighted in the middle - the balance issue wasn't literalized in the artwork. And yet, I know that I, for one, felt self-conscious about my own body when riding the seesaw - I looked for people who where about my size to ride with...
  • Conversing while riding this seesaw...(playful) physical activity allowed/encouraged a different kind of engagement. Embodied approach...

Return to Walks<br> Return to Marsha Bradfield's Research Hub<br> Visit Marsha's bio page <br>

Return to artists, researchers, academics and others<br> Return to Main Page <br>

</td> <td width="250px" valign="top" style="padding-left: 20px; border-left: 1px dotted #69c;">

Kristen Lovelock Should I Move in with Him.jpg Kristen Lovelock - part of Should I move in with him