Difference between revisions of "The New Aesthetics"

From Critical Practice Chelsea
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: <blockquote> The aesthetic criteria used to interpret art as a practice have changed radically since the 1960s. To note as much is to observe a truism: the idea (or should that be the idea...)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
----
 
----
Return to [[Practice Literature]] * Return to
+
Return to [[Practice Literature]]

Revision as of 10:22, 27 January 2010

The aesthetic criteria used to interpret art as a practice have changed radically since the 1960s. To note as much is to observe a truism: the idea (or should that be the ideal) of a universalist aesthetic point of reverence, or even a notion of aesthetics as a nominal interpretive baseline, has been discursively dispaced by identitatiran, theoretical, political, economic, ethical and social interventions. And yet aesthetics as a topic, far from fading into a minor role, has become something of a notional cornerstone in recent discussions about contemporary art. (AD: TPRA 267)

Return to Practice Literature